4.7 Review

A Global, Evidence-Based Consensus on the Definition of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in the Pediatric Population

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages 1278-1295

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.129

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [DK-53708, DK-06544]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK053708] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop an international consensus on the definition of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the pediatric population. METHODS: Using the Delphi process, a set of statements was developed and voted on by an international panel of eight pediatric gastroenterologists. Statements were based on systematic literature searches using Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Voting was conducted using a six-point scale, with consensus defined a priori as agreement in 75% of the group. The strength of each statement was assessed using the GRADE system. RESULTS: There were four rounds of voting. In the final vote, consensus was reached on 98% of the 59 statements. In this vote, 95% of the statements were accepted by seven of eight voters. Consensus items of particular note are: (i) GERD is present when reflux of gastric contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications, but this definition is complicated by unreliable reporting of symptoms in children under the age of similar to years; (ii) histology has limited use in establishing or excluding a diagnosis of GERD; its primary role is to exclude other conditions; (iii) Barrett's esophagus should be defined as esophageal metaplasia that is intestinal metaplasia, positive or negative; and (iv) extraesophageal conditions may be associated with GERD, but for most of these conditions causality remains to be established. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus statements that comprise the Definition of GERD in the Pediatric Population were developed through a rigorous process. These statements are intended to be used for the development of future clinical practice guidelines and as a basis for clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available