4.7 Article

Resolution of Tracheal Aspiration After the Acute Phase of Stroke-Related Oropharyngeal Dysphagia

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 104, Issue 4, Pages 923-932

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2008.160

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: We set out to ascertain the evolution and the clinical and videofluoroscopic (VFS) prognostic factors of aspiration recovery and return to oral intake in patients with stroke and VFS diagnosis of tracheal aspiration. METHODS: Twenty patients with stroke and VFS diagnosis of tracheal aspiration were prospectively evaluated. Clinical evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia and VFS examination were performed at admission and repeated at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: At admission, videofluoroscopy showed 40% of patients to have an increase in oral transit time and 65% impaired tongue control; in the pharyngeal phase, mean pharyngeal transit time was increased in 70% of patients and the time required to trigger the swallowing reflex was delayed in 70%. During follow-up, an improvement was observed, and the number of patients with aspiration decreased progressively (the most significant change occurred at 6 months). Evolution was related to the vascular territory affected: at 1 year, aspiration persisted in 12% of anterior territory lesions vs. 58% of posterior territory lesions. Also, the number of silent aspirators decreased from 35% at baseline to no patients after 3 months. Persistent aspiration at 1 year of follow-up significantly correlated with the following baseline variables: vascular territory, gag reflex abolition, palatoglossal seal alteration and pharyngeal delay time. CONCLUSIONS: Swallowing physiology in stroke greatly improved during follow-up, mainly between 3 and 6 months, and the number of aspirations decreased progressively. Prognostic factors for persisting aspiration are posterior vascular territory lesions, oropharyngeal reflex abolition, palatoglossal seal alteration and pharyngeal delay time at baseline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available