4.6 Article

Are Women Who Smoke at Higher Risk for Lung Cancer Than Men Who Smoke?

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 177, Issue 7, Pages 601-612

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws445

Keywords

case-control studies; lung cancer; sex differences; smoking

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland
  2. Lombardy Region, Direzione Generale Sanita, Environmental Epidemiology Program, Milan, Italy [14013-1/5/2010, 8956-7/6/2006]
  3. CARIPLO Foundation, Milan, Italy
  4. Ministero della Salute and Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro, Rome, Italy [PMS/42/06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Worldwide lung cancer incidence is decreasing or leveling off among men, but rising among women. Sex differences in associations of tobacco carcinogens with lung cancer risk have been hypothesized, but the epidemiologic evidence is conflicting. We tested sex-smoking interaction in association with lung cancer risk within a population-based case-control study, the Environment and Genetics in Lung Cancer Etiology (EAGLE) Study (Lombardy, Italy, 2002-2005). Detailed lifetime smoking histories were collected by personal interview in 2,100 cases with incident lung cancer and 2,120 controls. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for pack-years of cigarette smoking were estimated by logistic regression, adjusted for age, residence area, and time since quitting smoking. To assess sex-smoking interaction, we compared the slopes of odds ratios for logarithm of pack-years in a model for men and women combined. Overall, the slope for pack-years was steeper in men (odds ratio for female-smoking interaction = 0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.24, 0.62; P < 0.0001); after restriction to ever smokers, the difference in slopes was much smaller (odds ratio for interaction = 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.29, 1.37; P = 0.24). Similar results were found by histological type. Results were unchanged when additional confounders were evaluated (e.g., tobacco type, inhalation depth, Fagerstrom-assessed nicotine dependence). These findings do not support a higher female susceptibility to tobacco-related lung cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available