4.6 Article

Prenatal Exposures to Perfluorinated Chemicals and Anthropometry at 7 Years of Age

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 178, Issue 6, Pages 921-927

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt057

Keywords

body mass index; child; overweight; perfluorooctanesulfonate; perfluorooctanoate; prenatal exposure delayed effects; waist circumference

Funding

  1. Danish National Research Foundation
  2. Pharmacy Foundation
  3. Egmont Foundation
  4. March of Dimes Birth Health Foundation
  5. Lundbeck Foundation [267/06]
  6. Danish Graduate School in Public Health Science
  7. Danish Agency for Science, Technology, and Innovation [271-06-0421]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fetal exposure to the perfluoroalkyl acids, perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), has been associated with lower birth weight and lower weight and body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)(2)) in early infancy. It is, however, unclear if exposure to prenatal PFOS and PFOA has a lasting influence on growth. We estimated the associations between the maternal plasma level of PFOS or PFOA and the children's body mass index, waist circumference, and risk of overweight at 7 years of age. A total of 1,400 women were randomly selected from the Danish National Birth Cohort among those who provided blood samples early in pregnancy and gave birth to liveborn singletons in 1996-2002. Weight and height information at 7 years was available for 811 children. Multiple linear and logistic regression models were used for analyses. Maternal PFOS and PFOA concentrations were overall inversely but nonsignificantly associated with the children's body mass index, waist circumference, and risk of overweight at 7 years of age. In conclusion, plasma levels of PFOS and PFOA in pregnant women did not seem to have any appreciable influence on their children's anthropometry at this point in childhood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available