4.6 Article

Evaluation of the Body Adiposity Index in a Caucasian Population: The Hordaland Health Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 177, Issue 6, Pages 586-592

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws271

Keywords

adiposity; Bland-Altman plots; body adiposity index; body mass index; dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

Funding

  1. Advanced Research Programme of Norway
  2. Research Council of Norway
  3. Norwegian Rheumatism Association
  4. Johan Throne Hoist Foundation for Nutrition Research
  5. University of Oslo, Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we compared the relationships of body mass index (BMI) and body adiposity index (BAI) with body fat percentage (BF%) in a Caucasian, European population. BF% was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in a population-based cross-sectional study of 5,193 middle-aged (47-49 years) and elderly (71-74 years) men and women from the Hordaland Health Study in western Norway from 1997 to 1999. In the total population, the correlation between BAI and BF% was stronger (r=0.78) than the correlation between BMI and BF% (r=0.56) with similar results in the middle-aged and elderly groups. However, in men and women separately, BMI was a better correlate of BF% (for men, r=0.76; for women, r=0.81) than was BAI (for men, r=0.57; for women, r=0.72). BMI was also a better correlate of BF% than was BAI assessed by partial correlations adjusted for sex (for BMI-BF%, r=0.79; for BAI-BF%, r=0.67). Bland-Altman plots and BF%-stratified analyses showed that BAI tended to overestimate BF% in lean subjects and to underestimate it in those with higher proportions of body fat, but that it predicted BF% well for those whose BMI was in a normal range. At the individual level and in population studies adjusted for sex, BMI outperforms BAI as a predictor of BF%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available