4.6 Editorial Material

Invited Commentary: Is It Time to Retire the Pack-Years Variable? Maybe Not!

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 179, Issue 3, Pages 299-302

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt274

Keywords

cancer; cumulative exposure; exposure-time-response relationships; models of carcinogenesis; radiation; smoking; time-related modifiers; tobacco

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA014089, U19 CA148107] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES007048, R01 ES019876] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cumulative exposureuthe product of intensity and duration for a constant exposure rate or its integral over time if variableuhas been widely used in epidemiologic analyses of extended exposures, for example, the pack-years variable for tobacco smoking. Although the effects of intensity and duration are known to differ for exposures like smoking and ionizing radiation and simple cumulative exposure does not explicitly allow for modification by other time-related variables, such as age at exposure or time since exposure, the cumulative exposure variable has the merit of simplicity and has been shown to be one of the best predictors for many exposure-response relationships. This commentary discusses recent refinements of the pack-years variable, as discussed in this issue of the Journal by Vlaanderen et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(3):290298), in the broader context of general exposure-time-response relationships.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available