4.6 Article

The AusD Study: A Population-based Study of the Determinants of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration Across a Broad Latitude Range

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 177, Issue 9, Pages 894-903

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws322

Keywords

sunlight; ultraviolet radiation; vitamin D

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [497220]
  2. Cancer Council Queensland Senior Research Fellowship
  3. Queensland Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observational studies suggest that people with a high serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH) D) concentration may have reduced risk of chronic diseases such as osteoporosis, multiple sclerosis, type 1 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and some cancers. The AusD Study (A Quantitative Assessment of Solar UV Exposure for Vitamin D Synthesis in Australian Adults) was conducted to clarify the relationships between ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure, dietary intake of vitamin D, and serum 25(OH) D concentration among Australian adults residing in Townsville (19.3 degrees S), Brisbane (27.5 degrees S), Canberra (35.3 degrees S), and Hobart (42.8 degrees S). Participants aged 18-75 years were recruited from the Australian Electoral Roll between 2009 and 2010. Measurements were made of height, weight, waist: hip ratio, skin, hair, and eye color, blood pressure, and grip strength. Participants completed a questionnaire on sun exposure and vitamin D intake, together with 10 days of personal UV dosimetry and an associated sun-exposure and physical-activity diary that was temporally linked to a blood test for measurement of 25(OH) D concentration. Ambient solar UV radiation was also monitored at all study sites. We collected comprehensive, high-quality data from 1,002 participants (459 males, 543 females) assessed simultaneously across a range of latitudes and through all seasons. Here we describe the scientific and methodological issues considered in designing the AusD Study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available