4.6 Article

The Sleep-Time Cost of Parenting: Sleep Duration and Sleepiness Among Employed Parents in the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 177, Issue 5, Pages 394-401

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws246

Keywords

adult; cohort studies; humans, middle aged; parents; sleep; sleep duration

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01HL62252, 1R01AG036838, 1UL1RR02501]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insufficient sleep is associated with poor health and increased mortality. Studies on whether parenthood (including consideration of number and ages of children) is associated with sleep duration or sleep problems are scant and inconclusive. Using data collected in the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort Study (n=4,809) between 1989 and 2008, we examined cross-sectional associations of number and ages of children with self-reported parental sleep duration, daytime sleepiness, and dozing among employed adults. Longitudinal change in sleep duration over 19 years was examined to evaluate changes in parental sleep associated with children transitioning into adulthood (n=833). Each child under age 2 years was associated with 13 fewer minutes of parental sleep per day (95% confidence interval (Cl): 5, 21); each child aged 2-5 years was associated with 9 fewer minutes of sleep (95% Cl: 5, 13); and each child aged 6-18 years was associated with 4 fewer minutes (95% Cl: 2, 6). Adult children were not associated with shorter parental sleep duration. Parents of children over age 2 years were significantly more likely to experience daytime sleepiness and dozing during daytime activities. Parents of minor children at baseline had significantly greater increases in sleep duration over 19 years of follow-up. Parenting minor children is associated with shorter sleep duration. As children age into adulthood, the sleep duration of parents with more children approaches that of parents with fewer children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available