4.6 Article

Choline Intake During Pregnancy and Child Cognition at Age 7 Years

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 177, Issue 12, Pages 1338-1347

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws395

Keywords

choline; cognition; folate; memory; pregnancy

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [K24 HL 068041, K24 HD 069408, R01 HD 034568, R01 ES 016314, T32 CA 09001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animal models indicate that exposure to choline in utero improves visual memory through cholinergic transmission and/or epigenetic mechanisms. Among 895 mothers in Project Viva (eastern Massachusetts, 19992002 to 20082011), we estimated the associations between intakes of choline, vitamin B-12, betaine, and folate during the first and second trimesters of pregnancy and offspring visual memory (measured by the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning, Second Edition (WRAML2), Design and Picture Memory subtests) and intelligence (measured using the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition (KBIT-2)) at age 7 years. Mean second-trimester intakes were 328 (standard deviation (SD), 63) mg/day for choline, 10.5 (SD, 5.1) g/day for vitamin B-12, 240 (SD, 104) mg/day for betaine, and 1,268 (SD, 381) g/day for folate. Mean age 7 test scores were 17.2 (SD, 4.4) points on the WRAML 2 Design and Picture Memory subtests, 114.3 (SD, 13.9) points on the verbal KBIT-2, and 107.8 (SD, 16.5) points on the nonverbal KBIT-2. In a model adjusting for maternal characteristics, the other nutrients, and childs age and sex, the top quartile of second-trimester choline intake was associated with a child WRAML2 score 1.4 points higher (95 confidence interval: 0.5, 2.4) than the bottom quartile (P-trend 0.003). Results for first-trimester intake were in the same direction but weaker. Intake of the other nutrients was not associated with the cognitive tests administered. Higher gestational choline intake was associated with modestly better child visual memory at age 7 years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available