4.6 Article

Mortality Prediction by Surrogates of Body Composition: An Examination of the Obesity Paradox in Hemodialysis Patients Using Composite Ranking Score Analysis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 175, Issue 8, Pages 793-803

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr384

Keywords

body mass index; muscles; obesity; renal hemodialysis

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Disease [R01 DK078106, K24 DK091419]
  2. American Heart Association [0655776Y]
  3. DaVita Clinical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In hemodialysis patients, lower body mass index and weight loss have been associated with higher mortality rates, a phenomenon sometimes called the obesity paradox. This apparent paradox might be explained by loss of muscle mass. The authors thus examined the relation to mortality of changes in dry weight and changes in serum creatinine levels (a muscle-mass surrogate) in a cohort of 121,762 hemodialysis patients who were followed for up to 5 years (2001-2006). In addition to conventional regression analyses, the authors conducted a ranking analysis of joint effects in which the sums and differences of the percentiles of change for the 2 measures in each patient were used as the regressors. Concordant with previous body mass index observations, lower body mass, lower muscle mass, weight loss, and serum creatinine decline were associated with higher death rates. Among patients with a discordant change, persons whose weight declined but whose serum creatinine levels increased had lower death rates than did those whose weight increased but whose serum creatinine level declined. A decline in serum creatinine appeared to be a stronger predictor of mortality than did weight loss. Assuming residual selection bias and confounding were not large, the present results suggest that a considerable proportion of the obesity paradox in dialysis patients might be explained by the amount of decline in muscle mass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available