4.6 Article

The Epidemiology of Interpandemic and Pandemic Influenza in Vietnam, 2007-2010 The Ha Nam Household Cohort Study I

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 175, Issue 10, Pages 1062-1074

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws121

Keywords

communicable disease control; disease transmission; infectious; incidence; influenza; human; tropical climate

Funding

  1. United Kingdom Wellcome Trust [081613/Z/06/Z, 077078/Z/05/Z]
  2. Wellcome Trust [081613/Z/06/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prospective community-based studies have provided fundamental insights into the epidemiology of influenza in temperate regions, but few comparable studies have been undertaken in the tropics. The authors conducted prospective influenza surveillance and intermittent seroprevalence surveys in a household-based cohort in Vietnam between December 2007 and April 2010, resulting in 1,793 person-seasons of influenza surveillance. Age- and sex-standardized estimates of the risk of acquiring any influenza infection per season in persons 5 years of age or older were 21.1% (95% confidence interval: 17.4, 24.7) in season 1, 26.4% (95% confidence interval: 22.6, 30.2) in season 2, and 17.0% (95% confidence interval: 13.6, 20.4) in season 3. Some individuals experienced multiple episodes of infection with different influenza types/subtypes in the same season (n = 27) or reinfection with the same subtype in different seasons (n = 22). The highest risk of influenza infection was in persons 5-9 years old, in whom the risk of influenza infection per season was 41.8%. Although the highest infection risk was in school-aged children, there were important heterogeneities in the age of infection by subtype and season. These heterogeneities could influence the impact of school closure and childhood vaccination on influenza transmission in tropical areas, such as Vietnam.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available