4.6 Article

Dietary Fatty Acid Intake and Prostate Cancer Survival in rebro County, Sweden

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 176, Issue 3, Pages 240-252

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr520

Keywords

fatty acids; prostatic neoplasms; survival analysis

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R25 CA098566, 5 T32 CA09001-35]
  2. American Institute for Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although dietary fat has been associated with prostate cancer risk, the association between specific fatty acids and prostate cancer survival remains unclear. Dietary intake of 14 fatty acids was analyzed in a population-based cohort of 525 Swedish men with prostate cancer in rebro County (19891994). Multivariable hazard ratios and 95 confidence intervals for time to prostate cancer death by quartile and per standard deviation increase in intake were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression. Additional models examined the association by stage at diagnosis (localized: T0-T2/M0; advanced: T0-T4/M1, T3-T4/M0). Among all men, those with the highest omega-3 docosahexaenoic acid and total marine fatty acid intakes were 40 less likely to die from prostate cancer (P-trend 0.05 and 0.04, respectively). Among men with localized prostate cancer, hazard ratios of 2.07 (95 confidence interval: 0.93, 4.59; P-trend 0.03) for elevated total fat, 2.39 (95 confidence interval: 1.06, 5.38) for saturated myristic acid, and 2.88 (95 confidence interval: 1.24, 6.67) for shorter chain (C4-C10) fatty acid intakes demonstrated increased risk for disease-specific mortality for the highest quartile compared with the lowest quartile. This study suggests that high intake of total fat and certain saturated fatty acids may worsen prostate cancer survival, particularly among men with localized disease. In contrast, high marine omega-3 fatty acid intake may improve disease-specific survival for all men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available