4.6 Article

Modification of the Association Between Ambient Air Pollution and Lung Function by Frailty Status Among Older Adults in the Cardiovascular Health Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 176, Issue 3, Pages 214-223

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws001

Keywords

aging; effect modifier; epidemiologic; environmental exposure; frail elderly; respiratory function tests

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Healt, National Institute on Aging [T32 AG00247]
  2. National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases) [R01 DK061662]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N01-HC-85239, N01-HC-85079, N01-HC-85086, N01-HC-35129, N01 HC-15103, N01 HC-55222, N01-HC-75150, N01-HC-45133, HL080295]
  4. National Institute on Aging [AG-023629, AG-15928, AG-20098, AG-027058]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The susceptibility of older adults to the health effects of air pollution is well-recognized. Advanced age may act as a partial surrogate for conditions associated with aging. The authors investigated whether gerontologic frailty (a clinical health status metric) modified the association between ambient level of ozone or particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 10 m and lung function in 3,382 older adults using 7 years of follow-up data (19901997) from the Cardiovascular Health Study and its Environmental Factors Ancillary Study. Monthly average pollution and annual frailty assessments were related to up to 3 repeated measurements of lung function using cumulative summaries of pollution and frailty histories that accounted for duration as well as concentration. Frailty history was found to modify long-term associations of pollutants with forced vital capacity. For example, the decrease in forced vital capacity associated with a 70-ppb/month greater cumulative sum of monthly average ozone exposure was 12.3 mL (95 confidence interval: 10.4, 14.2) for a woman who had spent the prior 7 years prefrail or frail as compared with 4.7 mL (95 confidence interval: 3.8, 5.6) for a similar woman who was robust during all 7 years (interaction P 0.001).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available