4.6 Article

Association Between Use of Specialty Dietary Supplements and C-Reactive Protein Concentrations

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 176, Issue 11, Pages 1002-1013

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws186

Keywords

anti-inflammatory agents; chondroitin; C-reactive protein; dietary supplements; fish oils; glucosamine; inflammation; nutrition surveys

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [K05-CA154337, R01-CA142545, R25-CA094880]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laboratory evidence suggests that certain specialty dietary supplements have antiinflammatory properties, though evidence in humans remains limited. Data on a nationally representative sample of 9,947 adults from the 19992004 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used to assess the associations between specialty supplement use and inflammation, as measured by serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) concentration. Using survey-weighted multivariate linear regression, significant reductions in hs-CRP concentrations were associated with regular use of glucosamine (17, 95 confidence interval (CI): 7, 26), chondroitin (22, 95 CI: 8, 33), and fish oil (16, 95 CI: 0.3, 29). No associations were observed between hs-CRP concentration and regular use of supplements containing methylsulfonylmethane, garlic, ginkgo biloba, saw palmetto, or pycnogenol. These results suggest that glucosamine and chondroitin supplements are associated with reduced inflammation in humans and provide further evidence to support an inverse association between use of fish oil supplements and inflammation. It is important to further investigate the potential antiinflammatory role of these supplements, as there is a need to identify safe and effective ways to reduce inflammation and the burden of inflammation-related diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available