4.6 Article

Delivery by Cesarean Section and Early Childhood Respiratory Symptoms and Disorders The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 11, Pages 1275-1285

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr242

Keywords

asthma; cesarean section; respiratory sounds; respiratory tract infections

Funding

  1. Norwegian Ministry of Health
  2. Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
  3. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [N01-ES-75558]
  4. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Division of Intramural Research) [ES049019]
  5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [1 UO1 NS 047537-01]
  6. Norwegian Research Council/FUGE [151918/S10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies have indicated that children delivered by cesarean section are at an increased risk of developing wheezing and asthma. This could be the result of an altered immune system development due to delayed gut colonization or of increased neonatal respiratory morbidity. The authors examined the associations between delivery by cesarean section and the development of wheezing, asthma, and recurrent lower respiratory tract infections in children up to 36 months of age among 37,171 children in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. Generalized linear models were used in the multivariable analysis. Children delivered by cesarean section had an increased likelihood of current asthma at 36 months of age (relative risk = 1.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.03, 1.32), and the association was stronger among children of nonatopic mothers (relative risk = 1.33, 95% confidence interval: 1.12, 1.58). No increased risk of wheezing or recurrent lower respiratory tract infections was seen among children delivered by cesarean section. Findings were similar among children delivered by acute and elective cesarean section. In conclusion, children delivered by cesarean section may have an increased risk of current asthma at 36 months, but residual confounding cannot be excluded. In future prospective studies, investigators should reexamine this association in different age groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available