4.6 Article

Prediction Model of Parkinson's Disease Based on Antiparkinsonian Drug Claims

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 3, Pages 354-363

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr081

Keywords

antiparkinsonian agents; Parkinson disease; prediction; predictive value of tests; prescriptions; prevalence

Funding

  1. l'Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  2. l'Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  3. l'Agence Francxaise de Securite Sanitaire de l'Environnement et du Travail
  4. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  5. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  6. France Parkinson

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drug claims databases are increasingly available and provide opportunities to investigate epidemiologic questions. The authors used computerized drug claims databases from a social security system in 5 French districts to predict the probability that a person had Parkinson's disease (PD) based on patterns of antiparkinsonian drug (APD) use. Clinical information for a population-based sample of persons using APDs in 2007 was collected. The authors built a prediction model using demographic variables and APDs as predictors and investigated the additional predictive benefit of including information on dose and regularity of use. Among 1,114 APD users, 320 (29%) had PD and 794 (71%) had another diagnosis as determined by study neurologists. A logistic model including information on cumulative APD dose and regularity of use showed good performance (c statistic = 0.953, sensitivity = 92.5%, specificity = 86.4%). Predicted PD prevalence (among persons aged >= 18 years) was 6.66/1,000; correcting this estimate using sensitivity/specificity led to a similar figure (6.04/1,000). These data demonstrate that drug claims databases can be used to estimate the probability that a person is being treated for PD and that information on APD dose and regularity of use improves models' performances. Similar approaches could be developed for other conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available