4.6 Article

Relation of Prenatal Smoking Exposure and Use of Psychotropic Medication up to Young Adulthood

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 6, Pages 681-690

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr150

Keywords

adolescent; child; mental disorders; pregnancy; psychotropic drugs; smoking

Funding

  1. Turku University Hospital Research Foundation
  2. South-West Finnish Fund of Neonatal Research
  3. Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies
  4. Society Duodecim, Turku

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study objective was to determine the relation of prenatal smoking exposure to the use of psychotropic medication up to young adulthood by using population-based longitudinal register data consisting of all singletons born in Finland from 1987 to 1989 (n = 175,869). Information on maternal smoking was assessed during antenatal care and received from the Finnish Medical Birth Register. Information on the children's psychotropic medication (1994-2007) was received from the Drug Prescription Register, and the children's psychiatric diagnoses related to outpatient (1998-2007) and inpatient (1987-2007) care were derived from the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. A total of 15.3% (n = 26,083) of the children were exposed to prenatal smoking. The incidence of psychotropic medication use was 8.3% in unexposed children, 11.3% in children exposed to < 10 cigarettes per day (adjusted odds ratio = 1.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.29, 1.43), and 13.6% in children exposed to > 10 cigarettes per day (odds ratio = 1.63, 95% confidence interval: 1.53, 1.74). The exposure was significantly associated with the risk for all medication use and for both single- and multiple-drug consumption even after adjustment (e.g., mothers' severe psychiatric illnesses). These findings show that exposure to smoking during pregnancy is linked to both mild and severe psychiatric morbidity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available