4.6 Article

Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, and Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness in an Adolescent Population in Southern Italy

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 171, Issue 11, Pages 1195-1202

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq073

Keywords

adolescent; atherosclerosis; blood pressure; body mass index; fatty liver; liver diseases; obesity; sex

Funding

  1. BNC Foundation (Rome, Italy)
  2. Commune of Reggio Calabria (Reggio Calabria, Italy)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to determine, in an adolescent population, the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and the association of NAFLD and cardiovascular risk factors with carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT), a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis. The authors conducted a population-based study among 642 randomly selected adolescents aged 11-13 years in Reggio Calabria, southern Italy, between November 2007 and October 2008. Prevalences of overweight and obesity were 30.5% and 13.5%, respectively. The overall prevalence of NAFLD was 12.5%, increasing to 23.0% in overweight/obese adolescents. In univariate analysis, increased IMT was positively associated with the presence of NAFLD, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, systolic blood pressure (all P's < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.006), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (P = 0.006), alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.007), and C-reactive protein (P = 0.008) and was inversely associated with high density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, NAFLD (P = 0.002), BMI (P = 0.004), waist circumference (P = 0.003), and systolic blood pressure (P = 0.005) retained significant associations. The authors conclude that NAFLD, BMI, waist circumference, and systolic blood pressure are independent markers of increased IMT in a random sample of adolescents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available