4.6 Article

Association Between Maternal Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Congenital Heart Disease: A Register-based Spatiotemporal Analysis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 173, Issue 2, Pages 171-182

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq342

Keywords

air pollution; congenital abnormalities; heart defects; congenital; maternal exposure; sulfur dioxide; spatiotemporal analysis

Funding

  1. Newcastle University
  2. National Institute of Health Research (UK Department of Health)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have linked maternal exposure to air pollution with a range of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, the available evidence linking this exposure to congenital anomalies is still limited and controversial. The present case-control study tested the hypothesis that maternal exposure to ambient black smoke and sulfur dioxide is a risk factor for the occurrence of congenital heart disease. The authors used registry-based data on congenital heart disease for the population of the northeast of England in 1985-1996. A 2-stage spatiotemporal model was developed to predict weekly black smoke and sulfur dioxide levels at each maternal place of residence. Controls were frequency-matched to cases by year of birth (control-to-case ratio of 4:1). Two sets of analyses were performed, using predicted mean values of exposure and 1,000 simulated scenarios of exposure. The analyses were adjusted for birth year, socioeconomic status, infant sex, season of conception, and degree of urbanity. The authors found a weak association between maternal exposure to black smoke and congenital malformations of cardiac chambers and connections only when using exposure as a continuous variable. When the authors used quartiles of exposure, odds ratios did not show a dose-response relation for consecutive quartiles. For sulfur dioxide, the results were not indicative of any association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available