4.6 Article

Genetic Variation in the Progesterone Receptor and Metabolism Pathways and Hormone Therapy in Relation to Breast Cancer Risk

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 170, Issue 10, Pages 1241-1249

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp298

Keywords

breast neoplasms; hormone replacement therapy; progesterone; receptors; progesterone

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01 CA72787, R01 CA85913, R03 CA119746, R01 CA098858]
  2. National Institutes of Health [T32 CA09168]
  3. Department of Defense [06-1-0312]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relevance of progesterone to breast carcinogenesis is highlighted by evidence indicating that use of combined estrogen-progesterone therapy (EPT) is more strongly related to breast cancer risk than is use of unopposed estrogen therapy. However, few investigators have assessed how genetic variation in progesterone-related genes modifies the effect of EPT on risk. In an analysis combining data from 2 population-based case-control studies of postmenopausal breast cancer (1,296 cases and 1,055 controls) conducted in Washington State in 1997-1999 and 2000-2004, the authors evaluated how 51 single nucleotide polymorphisms in 7 progesterone-related genes (AKR1C1, AKR1C2, AKR1C3, CYP3A4, SRD5A1, SRD5A2, and PGR) influenced breast cancer risk. There was no appreciable association with breast cancer risk overall for any single nucleotide polymorphism. For rs2854482 in AKR1C2, carrying 1 or 2 A alleles was associated with a 2.0-fold increased breast cancer risk in EPT users (95% confidence interval: 1.0, 4.0) but not in never users (P(heterogeneity) = 0.03). For rs12387 in AKR1C3, the presence of 1 or 2 G alleles was associated with a 1.5-fold increased risk among EPT users (95% confidence interval: 1.1, 2.2) but not in never users (P(heterogeneity) = 0.02). Interpretation of these subgroup associations must await the results of similar studies conducted in other populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available