4.6 Article

Serum Selenium and Peripheral Arterial Disease: Results From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2004

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 169, Issue 8, Pages 996-1003

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn414

Keywords

antioxidants; cardiovascular diseases; cross-sectional studies; nutrition surveys; peripheral vascular diseases; selenium

Funding

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [1 R01 ES012673]
  2. American Heart Association [0230232N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors conducted a cross-sectional study of the association of serum selenium with the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease among 2,062 US men and women 40 years of age or older participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2004. Serum selenium was measured by using inductively coupled plasma-dynamic reaction cell-mass spectrometry. Peripheral arterial disease was defined as an ankle-brachial blood pressure index < 0.90. The age-, sex-, and race-adjusted prevalence of peripheral arterial disease decreased with increasing serum selenium (P for linear trend = 0.02), but there was an indication of an upturn in risk in the highest quartile of serum selenium. The fully adjusted odds ratios for peripheral arterial disease comparing selenium quartiles 2, 3, and 4 with the lowest quartile were 0.75 (95% confidence interval: 0.37, 1.52), 0.58 (95% confidence interval: 0.28, 1.19), and 0.67 (95% confidence interval: 0.34, 1.31), respectively. In spline regression models, peripheral arterial disease prevalence decreased with increasing serum selenium levels up to 150-160 ng/mL, followed by a gradual increase at higher selenium levels. The association between serum selenium levels and the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease was not statistically significant, although a U-shaped relation was suggested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available