4.6 Article

Culture of drinking and individual problems with alcohol use

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 167, Issue 9, Pages 1041-1049

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn022

Keywords

alcohol drinking; alcoholic intoxication; culture; residence characteristics; sex

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA017642, R01 DA022720, R01 DA 022720, R01 DA 017642] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Binge drinking is a substantial and growing health problem. Community norms about drinking and drunkenness may influence individual drinking problems. Using data from the New York Social Environment Study (n = 4,000) conducted in 2005, the authors examined the relation between aspects of the neighborhood drinking culture and individual alcohol use. They applied methods to address social strati. cation and social selection, both of which are challenges to interpreting neighborhood research. In adjusted models, permissive neighborhood drinking norms were associated with moderate drinking (odds ratio (OR) 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05, 1.55) but not binge drinking; however, social network and individual drinking norms accounted for this association. By contrast, permissive neighborhood drunkenness norms were associated with more moderate drinking (OR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.39) and binge drinking ( OR 1.92, 95% CI: 1.44, 2.56); the binge drinking association remained after adjustment for social network and individual drunkenness norms (OR 1.58, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.08). Drunkenness norms were more strongly associated with binge drinking for women than for men (p(interaction) = 0.006). Propensity distributions and adjustment for drinking history suggested that social strati. cation and social selection, respectively, were not plausible explanations for the observed results. Analyses that consider social and structural factors that shape harmful drinking may inform efforts targeting the problematic aspects of alcohol consumption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available