4.2 Article

Late-Season Foliar Urea Applications Can Increase Berry Yeast-Assimilable Nitrogen in Winegrapes (Vitis vinifera L.)

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 89-95

Publisher

AMER SOC ENOLOGY VITICULTURE
DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2013.13092

Keywords

yeast assimilable nitrogen; foliar spray; urea; nitrogen fertilization; veraison

Funding

  1. BC Wine Grape Council
  2. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada's Developing Innovative Agri-food Products (DIAP) program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia, low rates of nitrogen fertilizer are typically applied early in the growing season to prevent excessive vine growth, disease, and adverse changes in grape juice composition. As a consequence, grape juice yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) concentrations at harvest are often below the level considered sufficient to complete fermentation during winemaking and require augmentation with additional nitrogen. Over a three-year period at seven study sites planted to five winegrape varieties, late-season foliar applications of urea-N were investigated as a method for enhancing grape juice YAN. Foliar-applied solutions of urea at rates equivalent to 14-18 kg N/ha/yr (1% w/v, applied in one year only) or 28-36 kg N/ha/yr (2% w/v) caused significant improvements in grape juice YAN concentrations in six out of seven of the study sites each year, but there was no consistent pattern among years as to which study sites were most amenable to treatment. Little of the N applied in the foliar spray treatments appeared to be retained by the vines, and there were only few, small negative effects of treatment application on vine performance and juice quality. Thus, urea sprays applied to the foliage around the time of veraison show considerable promise as a supplement to more traditional soil fertilization programs on these and similar sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available