4.5 Article

Cardiac arrest caused by acute intoxication-insight from a registry

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 31, Issue 10, Pages 1443-1447

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.07.005

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the epidemiology and outcome after cardiac arrest caused by intoxication. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1991 to 2010 medical record of patients experiencing cardiac arrest caused by self-inflicted, intentional intoxication was performed. The setting was an emergency department of a tertiary care university hospital. The primary end point was the presentation of epidemiologic data in relation to favorable neurologic outcome, defined as cerebral performance categories 1 or 2 and 180-day survival. Furthermore, the patients were subdivided into a single-substance and polysubstance group, depending on the substances causing the intoxication. Results: Of 3644 patients admitted to our department, 99 (2.7%) with a median age of 26 (interquartile range, 19-42) years (37% female) were included. Cardiac arrest was witnessed in 62 cases (63%). Eleven patients (11%) received basic life support by bystanders, and 11 (11%) had a shockable rhythm in the initial electrocardiogram. The combined end point good survival was achieved by 34 patients (34%). Cardiac arrest occurred out of hospital in 73 patients (74%) and in-hospital in 26 patients (26%). A single substance causing the intoxication was found in 56 patients (56%). Opiates were the leading substance, with 25 patients (25%) using them. Conclusion: Cardiac arrest caused by intoxication is found predominately in young patients. Overall, favorable neurologic survival was achieved in 34%. Opiate-related cardiac arrest was associated with poor survival and a high incidence of neurologic deficits. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available