4.2 Article

The role of earthquake information management systems (EIMSs) in reducing destruction A comparative study of Japan, Turkey and Iran

Journal

DISASTER PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 150-161

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED
DOI: 10.1108/09653560910953225

Keywords

Natural disasters; Information systems; Earthquakes; Japan; Turkey; Iran

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The daily life of people is threatened by natural disasters Crisis management is that in which attempts are made to before. during and after disasters The most important factor for a manager to be able to overcome a crisis depends on his/her readiness before it The main objective of I his study was determining an earthquake information management system (EIMS) in Japan, Turkey and Iran and describing how it can reduce destruction by crisis management Design/methodology/approach This study was an analytical comparison in which data were collected by questionnaire, observation and checklist The subject was the EIMS in selected countries Sources of information were staff in related organizations, scientific documentation and the Internet To analyze the findings, criteria rating technique, Delphi technique, and descriptive method were used Findings - Findings showed that the EIMSs in Japan, Turkey and Iran are decentralized The EIMS is called Phoenix in Japan, and natural disaster management Information system or AFAYBIS in Turkey In Iran there was not a useful and efficient EIMS to evaluate earthquake information According to outcomes, it is clear that in information system can only influence decisions if it is relevant, reliable and available for the decision-makers in a timely fashion. Therefore, it is necessary to reform and design a model The model contains responsible organizations and their functions Originality/value - This paper contains valuable information on EIMSs and their role in reducing destruction

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available