4.0 Article

Building information modelling demystified: does it make business sense to adopt BIM?

Journal

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/17538370910971063

Keywords

Construction industry; Information modelling; Communication technologies; Project management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to inform project management practice on the business benefits of building information modelling (BIM) adoption. Design/methodology/approach - BIM needs to compete against well-ingrained methods to deliver projects in a fragmented and rather traditional industry. This paper investigates 47 value propositions for the adoption of BIM under a multiple case study investigation carried out in Australia and Hong Kong. The selected case study projects included a range of public (1) and private (4) sector building developments of small and large-scale. Findings are coded, interpreted and synthesised in order to identify the challenges and business drivers, and the paper focuses mainly on challenges and benefits for architectural and engineering consultants, contractors and steel fabricators. As a condition for the selection criteria all case studies had to be collaborating by sharing BIM data between two or more consultants/stakeholders. As practices cannot afford to ignore BIM, this paper aims to identify those immediate business drivers as to provoke debate amongst the professional and academic community. Findings - Shared understanding on business drivers to adopt BIM for managing the design and construction process of building projects raging from small commercial to high-rise. Originality/value - The originality of the research reported in this paper is that it breaks from a proliferating series of articles on BIM as industry aspiration and as a marketing statement. The elicited drivers for BIM underwent industry, academic and peer validation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available