4.1 Article

Significance of Cyclooxygenase 2, EZH-2 Polycomb Group and p53 Expression in Actinic Keratosis and Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Skin

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOPATHOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 425-431

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/DAD.0b013e318271292a

Keywords

actinic keratosis; AK; squamous cell carcinoma; SCC; COX-2; EZH-2; p53

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development and progression of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin is characterized by an accumulation of molecular changes. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of the immunohistochemical expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH-2), and p53 in actinic keratosis (AK) and SCC and detect any differences between invasive and preinvasive squamous epidermal lesions. Forty-three cases with AK, 38 with SCC, and 9 with SCC arising on AK (SCC/AK) were studied. For COX-2 immunostaining, weak or no reaction was associated with AK (58.10% of cases), whereas moderate or strong reaction with SCCs (34.2% and 39.5%, respectively). Furthermore, 88.9% of the mixed SCC/AK specimens demonstrated moderate reaction (chi(2) = 29.924, P < 0.0001). For EZH-2 immunostaining, a weak or no reaction was observed in 62.8% of AK cases, whereas a moderate reaction was observed in 42.1% of SCCs and 77.8% of mixed SCC/AK cases (chi(2) = 18.91, P = 0.001). Weak immunoreactivity of p53 was associated with AK (58.1%), moderate with SCC (44.7%), and strong with SCC/AK lesions (66.7%) (chi(2) = 15.999, P = 0.003). COX-2, p53, but mainly EZH-2 immune expression seems to be strongly associated with the biological potential of squamous epidermal cells and seems to be differentiating SCC by comparison to AK of the skin. The value of the combined expression of these markers is worth being further investigated as an additional tool for diagnostic, prognostic, and possibly, therapeutic use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available