4.5 Article

Nitrogen Increases Evapotranspiration and Growth of a Warm-Season Turfgrass

Journal

AGRONOMY JOURNAL
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 17-24

Publisher

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2008.0078

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Parks and Leisure Association of Australia
  2. CSBP Ltd
  3. Turf Grass Association of Australia (WA)
  4. WA Golf Course Superintendents Association
  5. Baileys Fertilisers
  6. Turf Master Facility Management
  7. Turf Growers Association of Western Australia
  8. Lawn Doctor
  9. Micro Control Engineering
  10. Water Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of N fertilizer rate on Kikuyu turfgrass [Pennisetum clandestinum (Hochst. ex Chiov)] evapotranspiration was evaluated during two summers. Evapotranspiration was measured using weighing lysimeters (205 mm in diameter by 625 mm in length) inserted in turfgrass field plots (10 m(2)). The experiment was a randomized plot design with three replicates. Treatments included two turfgrass ages (established from 20 wk or 20-yr-old turfgrass) and three N application rates (0, 50, or 150 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1)). Evapotranspiration ranged from 2.8 to 7.5 mm d(-1) (or 56-81% of evaporative demand), and varied with daily evaporative demand, turfgrass age, and N fertilizer rate. The older turfgrass used more water than the younger turfgrass during both summers; while increasing the N application rate also increased evapotranspiration for both turfgrass types (younger turfgrass only in the second summer). Evapotranspiration was positively correlated with turfgrass growth (r(2) = 0.74-0.80) and transpiring leaf area (r(2) = 0.78). Older turfgrass at all N treatments, and the younger turfgrass receiving 150 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1), had adequate growth, color, and leaf N concentrations. Optimizing fertilizer applications such that the minimum N required to maintain turfgrass quality is applied, is an approach for decreasing water consumption by turfgrass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available