4.1 Article

Job demands as a moderator of the political skill-job performance relationship

Journal

CAREER DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL
Volume 14, Issue 4-5, Pages 333-350

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/13620430910979835

Keywords

Job satisfaction; Job analysis; Organizational behaviour

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine whether political skill is equally effective in its prediction of job performance for different job demands. Design/methodology/approach - This paper uses self-report sources of employee performance and self-report of political skill after several weeks along with three ratings of target individuals' job demands. Findings - Results support the hypothesis that Holland's enterprising category (i.e. because of its job demands and requisite job competencies to be effective) will moderate the relationship between political skill and job performance, demonstrating stronger predictability under high enterprising job demands. Research limitations/implications - The present results suggest that political skill is a better predictor of job performance under situations of high enterprising job demands than under conditions of low enterprising job demands. Furthermore, social and conventional job demands do not significantly moderate the political skill-job performance relationships, implying that these job demands act as an important boundary condition. Practical implications - Politically skilled individuals are more likely to succeed in environments (e.g. enterprising jobs) where they have the opportunity to exercise interpersonal influence, and where that interpersonal influence is directly related to their performance. Originality/value - This paper makes several contributions to theory and practice in vocational achievement and political skill. Perhaps, most significant is the identification of job demands as a boundary condition in the political skill-job performance relationship.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available