4.3 Article

Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation of the BD GeneOhm VanR Assay for Direct, Rapid Detection of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Species in Perianal and Rectal Specimens

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages 219-226

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1309/AJCPR1K0QFLBJSNH

Keywords

Real-time polymerase chain reaction; Vancomycin-resistant enterococci; VRE; Surveillance; Infection control

Categories

Funding

  1. BD Diagnostics, San Diego, CA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The BD GeneOhm VanR assay (BD Diagnostics, San Diego, CA), a qualitative test for the rapid detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) from rectal and/or perianal swabs, combines integrated nucleic acid extraction and automated polymerase chain reaction for the detection of vanA and/or vanB gene sequences. We studied 1,027 perianal and rectal swab specimens from 3 geographically distinct US sites (prevalence rates, 13.1%-25.8%). Direct swab specimens were tested by the assay and compared with direct culture. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the assay were 93.2%, 81.9%. 54.4%, and 98.1%, respectively. The specificity was limited largely due to false-positives in the vanB portion of the assay. Specificity with perianal swabs was significantly greater than with rectal swabs, 87.1% vs 74.7%, respectively (P < .0001,). When used only to detect resistance conferred by vanA, the assay was 88.3% (158/179) sensitive and 95.8% (802/837) specific, with positive and negative predictive values of 81.9% and 97.4%, respectively. The assay is a simple, rapid, and acceptable method for screening for VRE in a variety of populations in which vanA is the predominant genotype. Samples positive jar the vanB genotype should be confirmed by culture owing to the apparent high number of false-positive results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available