4.7 Article

Distribution, origin and cycling of carbon in the Tana River (Kenya): a dry season basin-scale survey from headwaters to the delta

Journal

BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages 2475-2493

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-6-2475-2009

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Tana River basin (TRB) is the largest in Kenya (similar to 120 000 km(2)). We conducted a survey during the dry season throughout the TRB, analyzing a broad suite of biogeochemical parameters. Biogeochemical signatures in headwater streams were highly variable. Along the middle and lower river course, total suspended matter (TSM) concentrations increased more than 30-fold despite the absence of tributary inputs, indicating important resuspension events of internally stored sediment. These resuspended sediment inputs were characterized by a lower and C-14-depleted OC content, suggesting selective degradation of more recent material during sediment retention. Masinga Dam (a large reservoir on the upper river) induced a strong nutrient retention (similar to 50% for inorganic N, similar to 72% for inorganic phosphate, and similar to 40% for dissolved silicate). Moreover, while DOC pools and delta C-13 signatures were similar above, in and below the reservoir, the POC pool in Masinga surface waters was dominated by C-13-depleted phytoplankton, which contributed to the riverine POC pool immediately below the dam, but rapidly disappeared further downstream, suggesting rapid remineralization of this labile C pool in the river system. Despite the generally high turbidity, the combination of relatively high oxygen saturation levels, low delta O-18 signatures of dissolved O-2 (all <+24.2%), and the relatively low pCO(2) values suggest that in-stream primary production was significant, even though pigment data suggest that phytoplankton makes only a minor contribution to the total POC pool in the Tana River.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available