4.3 Article

The risk of false-positive histology according to the reason for colposcopy referral in cervical cancer screening

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue 1, Pages 75-80

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1309/EWYGWFRRM8798U5P

Keywords

cervical neoplasia; histology; colposcopy biopsy; sensitivity; specificity; positive predictive value

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

All cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) diagnoses identified during the New Technologies for Cervical Cancer trial (ISRCTN81678807) were blindly reviewed by 2 pathologists. Original diagnoses based on colposcopy-guided biopsies were compared with those made by the reviewers who had access to all clinical histologic samples (including postsurgical). Cases downgraded from CIN 2+ by the reviewers were considered indicative of unnecessary treatments. The analyses are presented according to the molecular (high-risk human papillomavirus [HPV]) and/or cytologic diagnosis used to refer the women for colposcopy. We reviewed 812 CIN 1 and 364 CIN 2+ diagnoses. The specificity of colposcopy-guided biopsy was 98% and the sensitivity, 84 %. The probability of unnecessary treatment was 27% for women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cytologic findings and 8% for women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse, 10% for HPV+ and positive cytologic findings, and 16% for HPV+ alone. The positive predictive value of the first-level screening test was inversely associated with probability of a histologic false-positive result (P =.015). In screening, a low positive predictive value of the colposcopy-referring test may result in unnecessary treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available