4.7 Review

Systematic review and meta-analysis of different dietary approaches to the management of type 2 diabetes

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages 505-516

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.112.042457

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: There is evidence that reducing blood glucose concentrations, inducing weight loss, and improving the lipid profile reduces cardiovascular risk in people with type 2 diabetes. Objective: We assessed the effect of various diets on glycemic control, lipids, and weight loss. Design: We conducted searches of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar to August 2011. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with interventions that lasted >= 6 mo that compared low-carbohydrate, vegetarian, vegan, low glycemic index (GI), high-fiber, Mediterranean, and high-protein diets with control diets including low-fat, high-GI, American Diabetes Association, European Association for the Study of Diabetes, and low-protein diets. Results: A total of 20 RCTs were included (n = 3073 included in final analyses across 3460 randomly assigned individuals). The low-carbohydrate, low-GI, Mediterranean, and high-protein diets all led to a greater improvement in glycemic control [glycated hemoglobin reductions of -0.12% (P = 0.04), -0.14% (P = 0.008), -0.47% (P < 0.00001), and -0.28% (P < 0.00001), respectively] compared with their respective control diets, with the largest effect size seen in the Mediterranean diet. Low-carbohydrate and Mediterranean diets led to greater weight loss [0.69 kg (P = 0.21) and 1.84 kg (P < 0.00001), respectively], with an increase in HDL seen in all diets except the high-protein diet. Conclusion: Low-carbohydrate, low-GI, Mediterranean, and high-protein diets are effective in improving various markers of cardiovascular risk in people with diabetes and should be considered in the overall strategy of diabetes management. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:505-16.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available