4.7 Article

Heme- and nonheme-iron absorption and iron status 12 mo after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese women

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages 810-817

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.112.039255

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Fund for Scientific and Technologic Development Research Project [1080576]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The effect of bariatric surgery on iron absorption is only partially known. Objective: The objective was to study the effects of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) on heme-and nonheme-iron absorption and iron status. Design: Fifty-eight menstruating women were enrolled in this prospective study [mean (+/- SD) age: 35.9 +/- 9.1 y; weight: 101.7 +/- 13.5 kg; BMI (in kg/m(2)): 39.9 +/- 4.4]. Anthropometric, body-composition, dietary, and hematologic indexes and heme-and nonheme-iron absorption-using a standardized meal containing 3 mg Fe-were determined before and 12 mo after surgery. Forty-three subjects completed the 12-mo follow-up. Iron supplements were strictly controlled. Results: Heme-iron absorption was 23.9% before and 6.2% 12 mo after surgery (P < 0.0001). Nonheme-iron absorption decreased from 11.1% to 4.7% (P < 0.0001). No differences were observed by type of surgery. Iron intakes from all sources of supplements were 27.9 +/- 6.2 mg/d in the SG group and 63.2 +/- 21.1 mg/d in the RYGBP group (P < 0.001). Serum ferritin and total-body iron decreased more after RYGBP than after SG. Conclusions: Iron (heme and nonheme) absorption is markedly reduced after SG and RYGBP. The magnitude of the decrease in heme-iron absorption is greater than that of nonheme iron. The amounts suggested as iron supplements may need to be increased to effectively prevent iron-status impairment. This trial was registered at controlled-trials.com as ISRCTN31937503. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;96:810-7.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available