Journal
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 338, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a2981
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Medical Research Council
- National Institute of Health Research
- Wellcome Trust
- Stanley Medical Research Institute
- Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health
- Smith Institute
- British Academy
- Economic and Social Research Council [RES-000-22- 2311]
- UK Department of Health
- Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
- Economic and Social Research Council [ES/E025390/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- Medical Research Council [G9817803B, G0500953] Funding Source: researchfish
- National Institute for Health Research [PHCS/C4/4/002] Funding Source: researchfish
- ESRC [ES/E025390/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- MRC [G0500953] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective To describe long term outcomes associated with externalising behaviour in adolescence, defined in this study as conduct problems reported by a teacher, in a population based sample. Design Longitudinal study from age 13-53. Setting The Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development (the British 1946 birth cohort). Participants 3652 survey members assessed by their teachers for symptoms of externalising behaviour at age 13 and 15. Main outcome measures Mental disorder, alcohol abuse, relationship difficulties, highest level of education, social class, unemployment, and financial difficulties at ages 36-53. Results 348 adolescents were identified with severe externalising behaviour, 1051 with mild externalising behaviour, and 2253 with no externalising behaviour. All negative outcomes measured in adulthood were more common in those with severe or mild externalising behaviour in adolescence, as rated by teachers,compared with those with no externalising behaviour. Adolescents with severe externalising behaviour were more likely to leave school without any qualifications (65.2%; adjusted odds ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 2.9 to 5.5), as were those with mild externalising behaviour (52.2%; 2.3, 1.9 to 2.8), compared with those with no externalising behaviour (30.8%). On a composite measure of global adversity throughout adulthood that included mental health, family life and relationships, and educational and economic problems, those with severe externalising behaviour scored significantly higher (40.1% in topquarter), as did those with mild externalising behaviour (28.3%), compared with those with no externalising behaviour (17.0%). Conclusions Adolescents who exhibit externalising behaviour experience multiple social and health impairments that adversely affect them, their families, and society throughout adult life.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available