Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages 1094-1104Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29523
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Unilever Research and Development (Vlaardingen Netherlands)
- Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (Zurich Switzerland)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background Random serial sampling is widely used in population pharmacokinetic studies and may have advantages compared with conventional fixed time point evaluation of iron fortification Objective Our objective was to validate random serial sampling to judge the efficacy of Iron fortification of a low-fat margarine Design We conducted a 32 wk placebo controlled double-blind iron-intervention trial in 18-40-y-old Swiss women (n = 142) with serum ferritin (SF) concentrations <25 mu g/L Women were ran domly assigned to 3 groups to receive 20 g margarine with 14 mg added iron as either micronized ground ferric pyrophosphate (MGFePP) or sodium iron edetate (NaFeEDTA) or placebo daily We measured hemoglobin and iron status of subjects at 2 fixed time points (at baseline and the endpoint) plus 3 randomly assigned time points between 4 and 28 wk With the use of bootstrapping the number of observations per individual was reduced to 3 and then compared with the 5 time point data Mixed-effects models were used to estimate Iron repletion over time for random sampling and analysis of covariance was used for fixed time point sampling Results Body iron stores increased in women who received MGFePP or NaFeEDTA compared with women who received placebo (P < 0 05) The increase in body iron stores with NaFeEDTA fortification was 2-3 times the increase with MGFePP fortification (P < 0 05) the difference was more marked in women with baseline SF concentrations <15 mu g/L (P < 0 05) Random serial sampling reduced the required sample size per group to one-tenth of that for 2 fixed time points Compared with the 5 time point analysis the 3-time-point sparse sampling generated comparable estimates of efficacy Conclusions When used to evaluate the efficacy of iron fortificants random serial sampling can reduce the sample size invasiveness and costs while increasing sensitivity Random serial sampling more clearly describes the pattern of iron repletion and may prove useful in evaluating other micronutrient interventions Am J Clin Nutr 2010 92 1094-104
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available