4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Mortality in British vegetarians: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Oxford)

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages S1613-S1619

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736L

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [G0501019] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council [G0501019] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0501019] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Few prospective studies have examined the mortality of vegetarians. Objective: We present results on mortality among vegetarians and nonvegetarians in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Oxford). Design: We used a prospective study of men and women recruited throughout the United Kingdom in the 1990s. Results: Among 64,234 participants aged 20-89 y for whom diet group was known, 2965 had died before age 90 by 30 June 2007. The death rates of participants are much lower than average for the United Kingdom. The standardized mortality ratio for all causes of death was 52% (95% CI: 50%, 54%) and was identical in vegetarians and in nonvegetarians. Comparing vegetarians with meat eaters among the 47,254 participants who had no prevalent cardiovascular disease or malignant cancer at recruitment, the death rate ratios adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and alcohol consumption were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.16) for ischemic heart disease and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.16) for all causes of death. Conclusions: The mortality of both the vegetarians and the nonvegetarians in this study is low compared with national rates. Within the study, mortality from circulatory diseases and all causes is not significantly different between vegetarians and meat eaters, but the study is not large enough to exclude small or moderate differences for specific causes of death, and more research on this topic is required. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 89(suppl): 1613S-9S.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available