4.7 Article

Choline in anxiety and depression: the Hordaland Health Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 1056-1060

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL NUTRITION
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27493

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Foundation to Promote Research into Functional Vitamin B-12 Deficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Despite its importance in the central nervous system as a precursor for acetylcholine and membrane phosphatidylcholine, the role of choline in mental illness has been little studied. Objective: We examined the cross-sectional association between plasma choline concentrations and scores of anxiety and depression symptoms in a general population sample. Design: We studied a subsample (n = 5918) of the Hordaland Health Study, including both sexes and 2 age groups of 46-49 and 70-74 y who had valid information on plasma choline concentrations and symptoms of anxiety and depression measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-the latter 2 as continuous measures and dichotomized at a score >= 8 for both subscales. Results: The lowest choline quintile was significantly associated with high anxiety levels (odds ratio: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.69) in the fully adjusted (age group, sex, time since last meal, educational level, and smoking habits) logistic regression model. Also, the trend test in the anxiety model was significant (P = 0.007). In the equivalent fully adjusted linear regression model, a significant inverse association was found between choline quintiles and anxiety levels (standardized regression coefficient = -0.027, P = 0.045). We found no significant associations in the corresponding analyses of the relation between plasma choline and depression symptoms. Conclusion: In this large population-based study, choline concentrations were negatively associated with anxiety symptoms but not with depression symptoms. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 90: 1056-60.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available