4.7 Article

Preliminary Evaluation of the Interactions of Panax ginseng and Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge with 5-Fluorouracil on Pharmacokinetics in Rats and Pharmacodynamics in Human Cells

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 443-458

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0192415X13500328

Keywords

Panax ginseng (PGS); Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge (SMB); 5-Fluorouracil; Pharmacokinetics; Pharmacodynamics; Cytotoxicity

Funding

  1. National Key Technology RD Program [2008BAI49B04]
  2. China National Science Foundation [81173139]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An increasing number of cancer patients are using herbs in combination with conventional chemotherapeutic treatment. It is therefore important to study the potential consequences of the interactions between herbs and anticancer drugs. The effects of extracts from Panax ginseng (PGS) and Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge (SMB) on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were performed in vivo and detected by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), while, an ATP assay was used to study the pharmacodynamic interactions in vitro. The results of the pharmacokinetic experiments showed a significant increase in the elimination half-life (t1/2(k(e))) of 5-FU in the PGS-pretreated group and in the area under the curve (AUC) in the SMB-pretreated group compared with the control group. However, after SMB pretreatment, weight loss was observed in rats. The results of pharmacodynamic experiments showed that neither PGS nor SMB, when used alone, directly inhibited cancer cell growth at 0.1-100 mu g/ml. Moreover, PGS had a synergistic cytotoxic effect with 5-FU on human gastric cancer cells but not on normal gastric cells. The results imply that when combined with 5-FU, PGS may be a better candidate for further study. This study might provide insights for the selection of herbal-chemotherapy agent interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available