4.7 Article

In vitro Antioxidation Activity and Genoprotective Effect of Selected Chinese Medicinal Herbs

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 827-838

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0192415X11009238

Keywords

Antioxidants; Comet Assay; DNA Protection; Fructus Ligustri Lucidi; Fructus Lycii; Fructus Schisandrae Chinensis; Semen Cuscutae

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Shatin)
  2. Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Some traditional Chinese medicinal seeds and fruits are well known for their antioxidant properties. This research aims to investigate whether Fructus Lycii, Fructus Schisandrae Chinensis, Fructus Ligustri Lucidi and Semen Cuscutae protect DNA from oxidant challenge by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). The standard comet assay was used to assess the genoprotective effect of these medicinal herbs. Blood was taken from three healthy adults, aged from 36 to 42. Lymphocytes were isolated and treated with different concentrations of aqueous herbal extracts, while controls were treated with phosphate buffered saline. The lymphocytes were stressed with 50 mu M H2O2. Treated cells were embedded in agarose and layered on slides. These sandwiched lymphocytes were lysed and afterwards subjected to an electric field in an alkaline environment. Damaged DNA was pulled out from the nucleus towards the positive electrode as a comet tail; its density was related to the degree of DNA damage. Finally, the slides were stained with fluorescence dye and tails were visually scored for 100 cells. The experiment was repeated three times and DNA damage in treated cells was compared to the controls. There was no statistical difference in DNA damage among the herb treated cells and untreated cells in the comet assay. Our data demonstrated that the selected medicinal herbs did not show in vitro DNA protection in the comet assay against oxidant challenge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available