4.4 Article

Impact of stent deployment procedural factors on long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (final results of the multicenter prospective STLLR trial)

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 12, Pages 1704-1711

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.053

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drug-eluting stent failures were associated with various clinical factors. However, the clinical impact of stent deployment technique was unknown. This study was designed to evaluate the frequency and impact of suboptimal percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term outcomes of 1,557 patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in 41 US hospitals. All steps of the interventional procedure were scrutinized by an independent core laboratory to determine the occurrence of geographic miss (GM). GM included longitudinal (LGM; injured or diseased segment not covered by SES) or axial GM (balloon-artery size ratio < 0.9 or > 1.3) mismatches. Patients with and without GM were stratified (GM vs no-GM group). Patients, investigators, and the independent clinical event adjudication committee were blind to study group assignments. The primary end point was 1-year target-vessel revascularization. (TVR) rate. Incidences and predictors of GM and safety outcomes were secondary end points. GM occurred in 943 patients (66.5%): 47.6% had LGM, 35.2% had axial GM, and 16.5% had both. One-year TVR rates were 5.1% in the GM group versus 2.5% in the no-GM group (p = 0.025). TVR was 6.1% in the LGM versus 2.6% in the no-LGM subgroups (p = 0.001). The association of GM with 1-year TVR was independent of clinical or anatomic factors (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 4.02, p = 0.05). There was a 3-fold increase in myocardial infarction rates associated with GM (2.4% vs 0.8%; p = 0.04). In conclusion, GM occurred frequently during SES implantation and was associated with increased risk of TVR and myocardial infarction at I year. These results emphasized the need for improvement in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention practices and technologies. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available