4.4 Article

Outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome and previous coronary artery bypass grafting (from the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy [PROVE IT-TIMI 22] and the Aggrastat to Zocor [A to Z] trials)

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages 552-558

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.04.024

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (Princeton, New Jersey)
  2. Sankyo Pharma. Inc. (Parsippany, New Jersey)
  3. Merck & Co.. Inc. (West Point, Pennsylvania)
  4. Merck-Schering-Plough Corp. (Kenilworth, New Jersey)
  5. Pfizer. Inc. (New York. New York)
  6. Eli Lilly & Co. (Indianapolis. Indiana)
  7. Sankyo Pharma, Inc.,
  8. AstraZeneca, Sanofi-Aventis, Inc.,
  9. CV Therapeutics. Inc., Palo Alto, California
  10. Massachussets, Schering-Plough Corp. (Kenilworth. New Jersey)
  11. Schering-Plough Corp.,
  12. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. (East Hanover, New Jersey)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined the effects of intensive statin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) and previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) participating in the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE-IT TIMI 22) and the Aggrastat to Zocor (A to Z) trials. Of the 8,655 patients enrolled in PROVE IT-TIMI 22 or A to Z, 640 (7.4%) had undergone CABG before enrollment. After a median follow-up of 2 years, compared with patients without previous CABG, those with previous CABG had a higher risk of cardiovascular death (6.2% vs 2.8% myocardial infarction (14.2% vs 6.6% and readmission for ACS (7.9% vs 4.4%, p < 0.001 for all comparisons) but a lower rate of repeat coronary revascularization (22.7% vs 26.9%, p = 0.01). Compared with moderate statin therapy, intensive statin therapy appeared to decrease the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stoke, and readmission for an ACS (A to Z primary end point) to a similar extent in patients with (26.1% vs 21.6%, hazard ratio 0.84, p = 0.27) and without (13.9% vs 12.0%, hazard ratio 0.86, p = 0.016) previous CABG, although the decrease was not statistically significant in the previous CABG group, likely due to the small number of patients with previous CABG. In conclusion, compared with patients with ACS without previous CABG, those with previous CABG have a higher risk for adverse cardiac events and may derive similar benefit from intensive statin therapy. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available