4.4 Article

Relation of aortic wall thickness and distensibility to cardiovascular risk factors (from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis [MESA])

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 4, Pages 491-496

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.04.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland [N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95169]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To determine the relation between aortic wall thickness (WT) and aortic distensibility (AD) with traditional cardiovascular risk factors in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohort, 1,053 participants in MESA who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging were consecutively selected for the measurement of aortic WT and AD. Double inversion-recovery fast spin-echo images of the thoracic aorta were obtained to measure average and maximum WT. AD was measured at the same level using a gradient-echo cine sequence. Average and maximum WT were positively correlated with increasing age, and AD was inversely related to age (p < 0.01). Compared with normotensive participants, those with hypertension had significantly greater mean average WT (2.45 vs 2.23 mm, p < 0.01) and maximum WT (3.61 vs 3.41 mm, p < 0.01) and lower AD (0.15 vs 0.2 mm Hg-1, p < 0.01). In multiple regression analysis, older age and hypertension were significantly associated with higher mean average WT, while older age, male gender, and higher blood pressure were associated with higher mean maximum WT. AD was inversely related to older age, hypertension, current smoking, African American ethnicity, and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. In conclusion, in the MESA cohort, older age and higher blood pressure were associated with higher aortic WT and lower AD. Decreased AD was further associated with current smoking, African American ethnicity, and higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available