4.4 Article

Impact of Sleep-Disordered Breathing on Life-Threatening Ventricular Arrhythmia in Heart Failure Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 8, Pages 1064-1068

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.05.057

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It was recognized that sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is associated with cardiac arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. However, it was unclear whether the presence of SDB increased the risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia in patients with heart failure (HF) with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Seventy-one patients with HF and an ICD who were followed up for 180, days after a sleep study were prospectively studied. All patients had an ejection fraction <= 35%. SDB was defined as an apneahypopnea index >= 10 events/hour on the sleep study. The frequency of appropriate ICD therapy and the day-night pattern of ICD therapies were compared between patients with and without SDB. SDB was diagnosed in 47 of 71 patients (66%). There were no statistical differences between patients with and without SDB in baseline cardiac function. However, appropriate ICD therapies occurred more frequently in patients with (43%) than without SDB (17%; p = 0.029). On multivariate analysis, the presence of SDB was an independent predictor for appropriate ICD therapy (hazard ratio 4.05, 95% confidence interval 1.20 to 13.65, p = 0.015). Moreover, the rate of total ICD therapy from midnight to 6 A.M. was significantly higher in patients with (34%) than without SDB (13%; p = 0.046). In conclusion, in patients with HF with an ICD, the presence of SDB was common and an independent predictor of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias that were more likely to occur during sleep. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2008;102: 1064-1068)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available