4.4 Article

Comparison of Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasonic Detection of Myocardial Bridging of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 12, Pages 1608-1613

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.07.054

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence, location, and clinical features of myocardial bridging (MB) detected by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and to compare IVUS-detectable versus angiographically detectable MBs. IVUS images were analyzed in 331 consecutive patients with de novo coronary lesions located in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). MB was defined as a segment of coronary artery having systolic compression and echocardiographically lucent muscle surrounding the artery (IVUS) or systolic milking (angiography). Although angiography detected MB in only 3% of patients (11 of 331), 75 MB segments (23%, 75 of 331, p <0.001) were identified by IVUS. Maximum plaque burden within the MB segment measured only 25 +/- 7%, and abnormal intimal thickness (defined as >= 0.5 mm) was not observed within the bridged segment of any patient with MB, although the study population had advanced atherosclerosis. Vessel and lumen areas in the MB segment were significantly smaller than those in adjacent proximal and even distal reference segments. Angiographically detectable MB was significantly longer, located more proximally in the LAD, and had more severe systolic compression by IVUS. Angiographically silent MB more often occurred in the presence of an adjacent proximal stenosis and lower left ventricular ejection fraction. In conclusion, IVUS may provide useful anatomic information for the accurate diagnosis of MBs that are largely angiographically silent. IVUS-detectable MBs were observed in approximately 1/4 of patients undergoing LAD imaging at our center. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. (Am J Cardiol 2008;102: 1608-1613)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available