4.5 Article

An overview of extant conifer evolution from the perspective of the fossil record

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages 1531-1544

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1143

Keywords

fossil calibration; molecular dating; paleobotany; seed cone evolution; fossil calibration; molecular dating; span style=color:red paleobotany; seed cone evolution

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EF-0629890]
  2. Prumnopitys harmsiana

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Conifers are an important living seed plant lineage with an extensive fossil record spanning more than 300 million years.The group therefore provides an excellent opportunity to explore congruence and conflict between dated molecular phylogenies and the fossil record. METHODS: We surveyed the current state of knowledge in conifer phylogenetics to present a new time-calibrated molecular tree that samples similar to 90% of extant species diversity. We compared phylogenetic relationships and estimated divergence ages in this new phylogeny with the paleobotanical record, focusing on clades that are species-rich and well known from fossils. KEY RESULTS: Molecular topologies and estimated divergence ages largely agree with the fossil record in Cupressaceae, conflict with it in Araucariaceae, and are ambiguous in Pinaceae and Podocarpaceae. Molecular phylogenies provide insights into some fundamental questions in conifer evolution, such as the origin of their seed cones, but using them to reconstruct the evolutionary history of specific traits can be challenging. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular phylogenies are useful for answering deep questions in conifer evolution if they depend on understanding relationships among extant lineages. Because of extinction, however, molecular datasets poorly sample diversity from periods much earlier than the Late Cretaceous. This fundamentally limits their utility for understanding deep patterns of character evolution and resolving the overall pattern of conifer phylogeny.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available