4.5 Article

ECOLOGICAL SPECIALIZATION IN TREBOUXIA (TREBOUXIOPHYCEAE) PHOTOBIONTS OF RAMALINA MENZIESII (RAMALINACEAE) ACROSS SIX RANGE-COVERING ECOREGIONS OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages 1127-1140

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1400025

Keywords

ecological specialization; genetic differentiation; host plant specificity; lichenized ascomycetes; phorophyte; photobiont; Ramalina menziesii; Ramalinaceae; symbiosis; Trebouxia decolorans; Trebouxiophyceae

Categories

Funding

  1. National Geographic Award
  2. Swiss National Foundation [PBBEA-111207]
  3. European Commission within FP7 (LICHENOMICS)
  4. UCLA Senate research award
  5. UCLA Life Science funds
  6. National Science Foundation award [DEB-0089445]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Premise of the study: Many lichens exhibit extensive ranges spanning several ecoregions. It has been hypothesized that this wide ecological amplitude is facilitated by fungal association with locally adapted photobiont strains. Methods: We studied the identity and geographic distribution of photobionts of the widely distributed North American lichen Ramalina menziesii based on rbcL (chloroplast DNA) and nuclear ribosomal ITS DNA sequences. To test for ecological specialization, we associate photobiont genotypes with local climate and phorophyte. Key results: Of the photobiont lineages of R. menziesii, 94% belong to a clade including Trebouxia decolorans. The remaining are related to T. jamesii. The photobionts showed (1) significant structure according to ecoregion and phorophyte species and (2) genetic associations with phorophyte species and climate. Conclusions: Geography, climate, and ecological specialization shape genetic differentiation of lichen photobionts. One great advantage of independent dispersal of the fungus is symbiotic association with locally adapted photobiont strains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available