4.5 Article

ANGIOSPERM WOOD STRUCTURE: GLOBAL PATTERNS IN VESSEL ANATOMY AND THEIR RELATION TO WOOD DENSITY AND POTENTIAL CONDUCTIVITY

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages 207-215

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0900178

Keywords

angiosperms; evolutionary divergences; potential conductivity; variances; vessel lumen fraction; vessel number; vessel size; wood density; xylem sapwood

Categories

Funding

  1. NESC, NSF [EF-0423641]
  2. NSF [OISE-0502253]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Woody stems comprise a large biological carbon fraction and determine water transport between roots and leaves; their structure and function can influence both carbon and hydrological cycles. While angiosperm wood anatomy and density determine hydraulic conductivity and mechanical strength, little is known about interrelations across many species. We compiled a global data set comprising two anatomical traits for 3005 woody angiosperms: mean vessel lumen area ((A) over bar) and number per unit area (N). From these, we calculated vessel lumen fraction (F = (A) over barN) and size to number ratio (S = (A) over bar /N), a new vessel composition index. We examined the extent to which F and S influenced potential sapwood specific stem conductivity (K-S) and wood density (D; dry mass/fresh volume). F and S varied essentially independently across angiosperms. Variation in K-S was driven primarily by S, and variation in D was virtually unrelated to F and S. Tissue density outside vessel lumens (D-N) must predominantly influence D. High S should confer faster K-S but incur greater freeze-thaw embolism risk. F should also affect K-S, and both F and D-N should influence mechanical strength, capacitance, and construction costs. Improved theory and quantification are needed to better understand ecological costs and benefits of these three distinct dimensions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available