4.5 Review

MALPIGHIALES PHYLOGENETICS: GAINING GROUND ON ONE OF THE MOST RECALCITRANT CLADES IN THE ANGIOSPERM TREE OF LIFE

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 96, Issue 8, Pages 1551-1570

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0800207

Keywords

Centroplacaceae; classification; low-copy nuclear gene; Malpighiales; multigene analyses; Peridiscaceae; Rafflesiacae; rapid radiation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The eudicot order Malpighiales contains similar to 16000 species and is the most poorly resolved large rosid clade. To clarify phylogenetic relationships in the order, we used maximum likelihood, Bayesian, and parsimony analyses of DNA sequence data from 13 gene regions, totaling 15604 bp, and representing all three genomic compartments (i.e., plastid: atpB, matK, ndhF, and rbcL; mitochondrial: ccmB, cob, matR, nad1B-C, nad6, and rps3; and nuclear: I SS rDNA, PHYC and newly developed low-copy EMB2765). Our sampling of 190 taxa includes representatives from all families of Malpighiales. These data provide greatly increased Support for the recent additions of Aneulophus, Bhesa, Centroplacus, Ploiarium, and Rafflesiaceae to Malpighiales sister relations of Phyllanthaceae + Picrodendraceae, monophyly of Hypericaccae, and polyphyly of Clusiaceae. Oxalidales + Huaceae, followed by Celastrales are successive sisters to Malpighiales. Parasitic Rafflesiaceae, which produce the world's largest flowers, are confirmed as embedded within a paraphyletic Euphorbiaceae. Novel findings show a well-supported placement of Ctenolophonaccae with Erythroxylaceae + Rhizophoraceae, sister-group relationships of Bhesa + Centroplacus, and the exclusion of Medusandra from Malpighiales. New taxonomic circumscriptions include the addition of Bhesa to Centroplacaceae, Medusandra to Peridiscaceae (Saxifragales), Calophyllaceae applied to Clusiaceae subfamily Kielmeyeroideae, Peraceae applied to Euphorbiaceae sublamily Peroideae, and Huaceae included in Oxalidales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available