4.5 Article

MYCORRHIZAL DIVERSITY IN APOSTASIA (ORCHIDACEAE) INDICATES THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF ORCHID MYCORRHIZA

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 96, Issue 11, Pages 1997-2009

Publisher

BOTANICAL SOC AMER INC
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0900101

Keywords

Apostasia; Asparagales; Basidiomycota; Botryobasidiaceae; Cantharellales; Ceratobasidiaceae; evolution; Orchidaceae; mycorrhiza

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for Promotion of Science [17370033, 21370038, 17255004]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21370038, 17255004, 17370033] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrated that orchid mycorrhiza, a specialized mycorrhizal type, appeared in the common ancestor of the largest plant family Orchidaceae and that the fungal partner shifted from Glomeromycota to a particular clade of Basidiomycota. in association with this character evolution. Several unique mycorrhizal characteristics may have contributed to the diversification of the family. However, the origin of orchid mycorrhiza and the diversity of mycobionts across orchid lineages still remain obscure. In this study, we investigated the mycorrhizae of five Apostasia taxa, members of the earliest-diverging clade of Orchidaceae. The results of molecular identification using nrDNA ITS and LSU regions showed that Apostasia mycorrhizal fungi belong to families Botryobasidiaceae and Ceratobasidiaceae, which fall within the order Cantharellales of Basidiomycota. Most major clades in Orchidaceae also form mycorrhizae with members of Cantharellales, while the sister group and other closely related groups to Orchidaceae (i.e., Asparagales except for orchids and the commelinid families) ubiquitously form symbioses with Glomeromycota to form arbuscular mycorrhizae. This pattern of symbiosis indicates that a major shift in fungal partner occurred in the common ancestor of the Orchidaceae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available